LoginSign up for free

Finding your product's aha moment, and checking it's real

Members of the Growth work group on watching users, testing candidate events against retention, and picking which one to work on first.

Updated October 13, 2026

Watch new users do the job they came for, turn what they valued into a few measurable candidates, and check each against later retention for the users you built the product for.

  • Start by watching new users. Lauryn Motamedi would watch people try the job they signed up for, then ask what they wanted. At Airtable, building a base with real entries and bringing in a collaborator marked users much more likely to still be there six months later.
  • Work back from the behavior that shows value. Casey Winters describes Pinterest moving from monthly visits, which notifications could drive, to weekly repinning, and Grubhub using a second order within 30 days. Both set the window by how often the need recurs. Brian Balfour makes the same point with meditation, a new routine, against sleep, which already happens every day.
  • Check that the event survives an onboarding change. Hila Qu cites a Jira team that pre-created three tickets for new users and got more completions with no extra retention. She would report three numbers per segment: who completes the action, who returns after a week, and who is still active later.
  • Check what users do next. Albert Cheng would look at the behavior after the candidate moment: at Chess.com, a second game a player chose to start, or a return to practice after a first lesson. Lauryn would keep the definition broad enough to cover several paths, and revisit it as the user mix changes.
  • Work first where the most target users fail. Brian would pick the candidate with the biggest drop-off among users the product was built for, since a strong predictor that almost everyone already reaches leaves little room to improve. He would test one path at a time and read the action and the later return separately.

Group chat with Hila, Lauryn, Albert, Brian, Casey — the Growth work group

Question:

How do you find the moment a new user first gets value from your product?

Lauryn Motamedi
Lauryn MotamediFormer VP Growth and Product at Notion and Head of Growth at Airtable
I’d start by watching new users try to do the job they signed up for, then ask what they were trying to accomplish and where they felt they had something worth returning to. At Airtable, we spoke with customers and watched them get started; their different levels of familiarity with databases changed the help they needed.YouTube
Then I’d turn the observed outcomes into a few measurable candidates and compare cohorts. For Airtable, building a base with substantive entries and bringing in a collaborator was a stronger signal of value because those users were much more likely to still use the product six months later. I look for both an early meaningful action and evidence that the user comes back.YouTube
Validate the candidate by checking how strongly it predicts later use across the different kinds of new users, and by changing onboarding to help more people reach it. Track the action and subsequent retention separately. At Airtable, we tracked individual retention and a measure of building sophistication alongside week-four multi-user activity, since an onboarding change could improve one without moving the others.YouTube
Hila Qu 曲卉
Hila Qu 曲卉PLG advisor. Former Director of Growth at GitLab and VP of Growth at Acorns
Lauryn’s Airtable example shows why the first-value event needs a retention check. I’d add a test for whether the event is still meaningful when onboarding changes. A Jira team identified “creating three tickets” as an aha moment and pre-created three tickets for new users. That raised the event count without producing retention or conversion. A good experiment removes friction so users can complete the meaningful action themselves; then check whether the extra completions bring more retained users. For B2B products, run that check separately for the individual user, team, and buyer, since their first payoffs can differ.LinkedIn
Lauryn Motamedi
Lauryn MotamediFormer VP Growth and Product at Notion and Head of Growth at Airtable
Hila’s Jira example is a good reason to inspect what the user actually built after an onboarding change. At Airtable, we separated individual retention, building sophistication, and week-four multi-user activity. A guided flow could help someone build more without yet bringing in a teammate, and each result taught us something different about the path to value.YouTube
I’d use that readout to change the next step in onboarding: give someone just enough support to complete their own workflow, then teach the advanced feature when that workflow calls for it. We found it useful to watch users start and group them by how familiar they were with databases, because a single tour would have missed the different help they needed.YouTube
Albert Cheng
Albert ChengChief Growth Officer at Chess.com. Previously led growth at Grammarly and Duolingo
At Chess.com, I’d split the analysis by why a player joined. Someone who wants to play might get value after finishing a first game; someone who wants to improve might need to understand a mistake and try again. Both are hypotheses. A single activation event across those players could hide which experience actually brings each group back. Chess.com serves both play and learning, and my remit is to improve growth through experimentation.
Hila’s Jira example is why I’d check the behavior after the proposed moment, too. For the play group, I’d look for a second game they chose to start; for the learning group, I’d look for a return to practice after their first lesson. Those follow-on actions help distinguish a completed onboarding task from a reason to come back. I’d compare them within each goal group, then test whether helping people reach the first action also improves week-one return.
Casey Winters
Casey WintersCo-founder at SuperMe. Ran growth at Pinterest, Grubhub and Eventbrite
Start with the behavior that tells you a user received value, then work backward to the first time they experienced it. At Pinterest, a monthly visit was too easy to drive with notifications. We moved toward weekly repinning because finding something worth saving was a clearer sign of value. At Grubhub, a second order within 30 days was a useful signal because people already ordered delivery roughly once or twice a month. Those were retention measures, which helped us identify the first-value experience to investigate.Spotify
Frequency matters as much as the event. Compare the first experience with how often the underlying need recurs: a delivery order may be monthly, while discovering useful ideas on Pinterest can be weekly. Repinning was a deliberately stricter proxy; some people certainly got value by browsing. Set the repeat window around the user's need, then use interviews with retained and churned users to check whether the candidate first action captured the payoff they actually felt.Spotify
Hila Qu 曲卉
Hila Qu 曲卉PLG advisor. Former Director of Growth at GitLab and VP of Growth at Acorns
I’d also separate first-week retention from later retention when validating an activation event. An event that predicts a second visit may still have little relationship to sustained use. In my growth-model work, I break retention into first-week and rest-of-life rates, then examine whether inputs differ by persona, channel, or device.Substack
For the onboarding test, that means reporting three numbers for each relevant segment: the share of new users completing the candidate action, the share returning after a week, and the share still active later. A jump in the first number with flat later retention is a reason to revisit the candidate action or what users did after it.
Lauryn Motamedi
Lauryn MotamediFormer VP Growth and Product at Notion and Head of Growth at Airtable
I’d keep the activation definition broad enough to capture different ways users find value. An overly narrow checklist can encode what the team assumes matters and leave out a user who has built a real habit. I look for an early meaningful use plus a return, and I check whether the combined signal predicts longer-term use.YouTube
Albert’s play and learning groups are a useful case for revisiting the definition as the product changes. I’d compare each group’s early behavior with its later retention and update the metric as the mix of users or features changes. Spending months perfecting a fixed activation metric has limited value if next year’s users are doing different work.YouTube
Brian Balfour
Brian BalfourFounder/CEO at Reforge. Previously VP Growth at HubSpot
The hardest activation journeys ask people to form a new habit. In discussing Calm, I pointed to the difference between meditation, which often requires a new routine, and sleep, which already happens every day. That distinction changes what I’d validate: a first meditation session can show initial value, while repeated sessions show whether the user has made room for the product in their life. The test window should follow the behavior you hope to establish.churn
For that analysis, I’d compare successes and failures within the target audience. If a free signup flow attracts people outside the use case, their early drop-off makes the failure data noisy. Look at target users who came for the same job, then examine where their paths diverge between setup, first value, and repeat use. That gives you a specific step to improve and a downstream behavior to check after the change.churn
Question:
Albert proposed different first-value actions for players and learners, while Hila warned that an easy-to-complete event can mislead. Brian, how would you choose which candidate to test first when each predicts retention?
Brian Balfour
Brian BalfourFounder/CEO at Reforge. Previously VP Growth at HubSpot
I’d choose the candidate where a change can reach the most target users who are failing today. For the play and learning groups, calculate the size of each group, the share that reaches its candidate first-value action, and the share that later repeats the relevant behavior. Then inspect the drop-off among players who wanted a game or learners who wanted to improve. A strong predictor with almost no drop-off gives the team little room to improve; a large drop-off in the target group gives us a specific problem to work on. I’ve argued for comparing target-audience failures with successes because an open signup flow adds noise from people the product was never built to serve.churn
Pick one path for the first experiment and keep the action and later return as separate readouts. If we help more learners complete a lesson but their return to practice stays flat, the event or the experience after it needs another look. Teams struggle to move activation when they spread experiments across too many levers at once; focus gives us time to watch users, test a change, and learn from failures.YouTube

Ask a follow-up

+8

126

Growth

3.5M+ insights

Growth leaders from Shopify, Airbnb, Pinterest & 5 more

by Lenny Rachitsky

In This Conversation

  • Hila Qu 曲卉
    Hila Qu 曲卉

    PLG advisor. Former Director of Growth at GitLab and VP of Growth at Acorns

  • Lauryn Motamedi
    Lauryn Motamedi

    Former VP Growth and Product at Notion and Head of Growth at Airtable

  • Albert Cheng
    Albert Cheng

    Chief Growth Officer at Chess.com. Previously led growth at Grammarly and Duolingo

  • Brian Balfour
    Brian Balfour

    Founder/CEO at Reforge. Previously VP Growth at HubSpot

  • Casey Winters
    Casey Winters

    Co-founder at SuperMe. Ran growth at Pinterest, Grubhub and Eventbrite

See all

Frequently Asked Questions

  • How do you choose a startup's first growth channel?

    Pick a channel the product can feed, test it with one narrow segment on a set budget and date, and judge it by how many users reach value and come back.

  • What should a founder check first when growth stalls?

    That the data is right, then cohort retention split by segment and channel. If curves trend toward zero in every slice, fix the product before spending more on acquisition.

  • How do you tell a growth problem from a product problem?

    Bring in a small batch of users from one clean channel and read their cohorts. If they activate and return but there aren't many, it's distribution. If they leave within the first week, product owns the fix.

  • What moves activation in a new user's first few days?

    Find where users drop, then match the lever: pre-answer setup for users who stall, make the first action an earned win for users who feel nothing, and bring back users who got value.

  • Who should own acquisition and retention, growth or marketing?

    Most members would split near signup, with marketing on channels and the promise and growth on the path to first value. The line still has to follow the growth model, and both teams judge channels by the cohorts that stay.

  • Should a growth team report to product or marketing?

    Wherever the biggest lever is. For most product-led companies that is product, next to core rather than inside it, and once paid spend matters too, one growth leader owns acquisition and activation.

  • Which lifecycle emails should a team build first?

    The ones aimed at the steepest drop on the retention curve, usually the activation email. Depth and renewal emails come next, and win-back to fully churned users comes last.

  • How do you bring back signups who went quiet?

    Watch a few try the next step and fix where they stall, then test the message with and without the fix against a holdout, and count retained use rather than opens.

  • When should a product-led company add sales?

    A founder can start working accounts where usage is spreading and retaining. A sales team follows once deals need security reviews and procurement that self-serve can't handle.

  • Which self-serve accounts should a sales rep call?

    Ones big enough to pay for a rep's time, with use spreading inside the company and a need self-serve can't meet. Hold some flagged accounts back to check that sales added value.

  • Which early action should count as activation?

    Use two measures: an early action onboarding can move as the team's operating metric, and a later repeat action to check that those users came back. Randomize the onboarding change so motivated users don't skew the read.

  • What makes a good north star metric for an early product?

    A retention measure built from how often the problem occurs, the action that solves it and the user it describes, with activation as an input. Drop it if the team can raise it without users getting more value.

  • Should a new marketplace build supply or demand first?

    Whichever side gets a buyer to a completed transaction while giving the supplier a reason to stay. Start in one narrow market and track matches, supplier earnings and repeat buyers.

  • When can a marketplace copy its first city?

    When service holds after subsidies come down, a new manager can run the launch playbook without the founders, and the team knows whether the channel behind market one's demand starts warm or cold in the next market.

  • How should you test a landing page?

    Show visitors what they searched for before the ask, start with the page's first clear funnel drop, and count activated users per visitor alongside signups.

  • Should a startup with a few dozen users stop acquisition?

    Stop broad acquisition but keep a small hand-picked flow from one segment, onboard those users live, and count only return visits nobody prompted.

  • How does a B2B startup find its first paying customers?

    Have founders sell by hand to one narrow buyer, starting with warm intros and asking for payment early. Then check who actually paid, and at what price, before choosing a channel to scale.

All startup growth questions  →

Your ideas, super powered.

Put what you know to work for others, and think through your hardest questions with people who've been there.

Topics

  • Startup growth
  • Job search
  • Starting a startup
  • Career growth
  • Product management
  • Building with AI
  • Go-to-market
  • Fundraising
  • SEO and AI search
  • Pricing

Work Groups

  • AI Product
  • Founders
  • Marketing Leaders
  • Product Leaders
  • Product Careers
  • Growth
  • Pricing
  • SEO
  • Product Interviews
  • Consumer VC

Company

  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 Super Me Network, Inc.

contact@superme.ai