When a SaaS partner program is worth building

An integration pilot, a repeatable sales motion or a full partner program: the Marketing Leaders work group debates which comes first.

Updated October 13, 2026

Pilot with a few partners who already help customers, and fund a full program once the team can repeat the handoff and partner-assisted accounts show incremental payback.

Start with people already doing the work. Rachel Hepworth would begin once community members or partners already help customers get value, as Notion's template creators did.
Pilot the integration before the program. Brittany Bingham treats a product integration as the first partner investment. Micah Moreau and Sri Batchu would fund a small integration pilot early, and hold back commissions and broad recruiting until the sales handoff is repeatable.
Measure what the partner caused. Sri compares similar customers or markets with and without partner support. Micah says a partner tag on an account is an attribution record and does not show the partner caused the sale.
Judge each partner on its own step. Rachel would judge a template creator on discovery and an implementation partner on team rollout. Kira Klaas checks whether customers arrive with an accurate idea of what the product can do.

Group chat with Rachel, Brittany, Kira, Micah, Sri — the Marketing Leaders work group

Question:

When is a partner program worth building for a SaaS company, and what makes one work?

Rachel HepworthCMO at Harvey. Former CMO at Notion

I’d build a partner program once people are already helping customers get value from the product, and the company can make that work easier to repeat. At Notion, community members taught others, created workflows and templates we hadn’t imagined internally, and some built businesses around the product. We gave them beta access and educational materials so they could become product experts, while leaving them room to choose what to make and share.

Apple Podcasts

For a SaaS team, I’d start with a handful of people already doing this work. Ask which customer problems they solve, give them product access and practical training, then watch whether their customers activate and keep using the product. Those outcomes would tell me whether a formal program is worth the ongoing support.

Sri BatchuFormer Head of Growth at Ramp and CMO at The RealReal

The bar for funding a partner program is a working direct sales motion and a specific group of partners that repeatedly meets the buyer at the right moment. At Ramp I described a B2B sequence that starts with founder-led sales, then a small sales team and low-cost targeted marketing. Each later channel gets more effective as you learn more about the customer. A partner program should clear that same bar.

Apple Podcasts

Start with a few partners and measure qualified introductions, closed customers, gross profit after commissions and support costs, and whether those customers would have arrived through your own sales motion. Give the partner a clear reason to bring you into its customer conversation and a simple handoff to your sales team. If the economics work only when every deal gets executive attention, keep the relationships and delay building the program.

Rachel HepworthCMO at Harvey. Former CMO at Notion

Sri’s economics test matters, and I’d give the partner-sourced customers enough time to show their value. At Notion, people often started as individual users, then adopted it with a team, and only later became larger business customers. Looking at the first purchase alone would undercount a partner who helps a team get started well.

Apple Podcasts

I’d compare partner-assisted accounts with similar direct accounts on time to first useful workflow, team adoption, and later expansion. That tells you whether partners improve the customer journey as well as the acquisition cost.

Brittany BinghamVP of Marketing at Fathom. Former VP of Marketing at Guru

The product integration can be the first partner investment. At Guru, we launched ways to surface knowledge inside Microsoft Teams and connect it through Zapier, Workato, and webhooks. The public product story was about helping people use Guru where they already work.

LinkedIn+1

For an integration-led program, I’d look for customers repeatedly using the two products together. Then I’d work with a few partners to make that shared workflow easy to set up and track whether customers actually adopt it. If the workflow drives sustained use and gives each side a clear reason to support it, invest in training and a shared customer handoff. A long list of integration logos gives you little evidence about customer impact.

Rachel HepworthCMO at Harvey. Former CMO at Notion

Brittany’s shared-workflow test also helps decide which partner should own which step. At Notion, people often arrived through personal use, while a larger company rollout brought questions about security, customer success, and contracts. The person who gets someone excited to try a tool may have a very different job from the person who can help a company deploy it across hundreds of employees.

Apple Podcasts

I’d write down the customer step each partner helps with before setting one commission or certification scheme for everyone. A template creator might help people discover a use case; an implementation partner should be evaluated on successful team rollout.

Sri BatchuFormer Head of Growth at Ramp and CMO at The RealReal

Rachel’s point changes the measurement window. A partner who helps a team reach a useful workflow may create value long before the account expands, so I’d track activation and later gross profit by cohort rather than judge only the first invoice.

The harder question is incrementality. At Instacart, we kept a persistent holdout for ads because an important revenue stream still needed a counterfactual.

Apple Podcasts For partnerships, I’d compare similar customers or markets with and without partner support, then check whether the lift in activated, retained customers covers commissions and the time spent supporting partners. Attribution to a partner is easy to record. Extra value caused by the partner takes more work to establish.

Kira KlaasVP of Corporate Marketing and Brand at Later. Former Director of Brand at Brex

The partner’s explanation becomes part of the customer’s first experience of your brand. I’d give a creator a precise use case, product access, and space to show the workflow in their own voice. If their demo promises a result the product can’t deliver, the program can generate leads and still leave customers disappointed.

In my B2B creator marketing work, I’ve argued for expert-led demos and ongoing relationships over isolated sponsored posts. At Later, I’ve seen the value of treating creators as partners who understand their audience, with creative freedom inside clear brand guardrails. That suggests a useful pilot measure alongside Sri’s deal economics and Rachel’s adoption data: are customers arriving with an accurate idea of what the product can do, and are they using the workflow the partner taught?

Substack

Question:

Micah, Sri requires a repeatable direct sales motion before funding a partner program, while Brittany would first invest in integrations customers already use. If a SaaS company has strong integration use but no repeatable sales motion, what would you fund next, and what result would change that decision? Please cite public sources.

Micah MoreauVP of Growth at OpenAI. Former VP of Growth Marketing at DoorDash

I’d fund the integration workflow and its measurement next: make setup reliable, document the use case, and track whether connected accounts reach the useful action, retain, and expand. I’d work closely with a few integration partners already helping customers, but hold off on a broad recruiting and commission program while sales handoffs are still bespoke.

The decision changes when partner-assisted accounts consistently outperform comparable unassisted accounts on activation and later gross profit, after support and partner costs, and the team can repeat the handoff without executive intervention. I’ve argued that marketers should measure incremental, causal return rather than accept credited conversions; a partner tag on an account is an attribution record, not evidence the partner caused the sale.

Question:

Sri, Micah would fund an integration pilot before sales handoffs become repeatable, then wait to recruit partners widely. Does your direct-sales prerequisite apply to that pilot or to a scaled referral program, and why? Please cite only public sources.

Sri BatchuFormer Head of Growth at Ramp and CMO at The RealReal

My direct-sales prerequisite applies to the scaled referral program. I’d fund Micah’s integration pilot earlier, because an integration customers already use can teach us which workflow creates value and which buyer cares. I would keep the pilot small and measure activation, retention, and support cost for connected accounts. A commission scheme and broad partner recruiting need a repeatable handoff and clear unit economics.

At Ramp, I described starting B2B growth with founder-led sales so the early team learns how to sell before investing in more expensive channels. I also described holding growth engineers and sales to shared pipeline and channel-payback goals. The same logic applies here: use the pilot to learn the workflow, then fund a partner program when the team can repeat the sale and show incremental payback.

Apple Podcasts

Question:

Brittany, Sri and Micah would start with a small integration pilot. In your Guru example, how would you divide setup, customer support, and measurement between the SaaS team and an integration partner, and why would each side invest the time? Please cite only public sources.

Brittany BinghamVP of Marketing at Fathom. Former VP of Marketing at Guru

For the pilot, I’d have the SaaS team own the product setup guide, the first useful action to measure, and support for problems inside its product. The integration partner should verify its side of the setup, own issues inside its product, and give customers a clear way to reach the right team when an issue crosses both. The two teams should agree on a small set of shared measures: successful connections, use of the joint workflow, repeat use, and support burden. Each side invests time if the workflow helps its own customers get useful work done more easily.

At Guru, we shared ways for customers to surface knowledge inside Microsoft Teams and automate related work through Zapier, Workato, and webhooks. Those public examples show the customer use case; they do not establish how we divided support with those companies.

LinkedIn+1 I’d put the proposed division in writing before inviting more customers into the pilot.

Question:

Kira, you favor ongoing expert-led demos over one-off posts. How would you test whether creators will keep teaching a SaaS workflow that customers actually use? Please cite only public sources.

Kira KlaasVP of Corporate Marketing and Brand at Later. Former Director of Brand at Brex

I’d give a small group of creators one customer problem and access to the product, then ask each to teach the workflow in a format their audience already trusts (a demo, newsletter, or tutorial). Pay for a short series rather than one post, and leave room for creators to show where users get stuck. In my B2B creator marketing work, I’ve argued that expert-led demos and repeated touches build trust more effectively than tightly scripted promotion.

Substack

After each lesson, track who tries the workflow, reaches its first useful outcome, and returns to it. Ask those users what they thought the product would do and compare their answers with what the creator taught. I’d keep investing when creators want to teach the next workflow and their audience keeps using the first one; that feedback also tells the product team which onboarding steps need work.

Ask a follow-up

Marketing Leaders

239

Marketing Leaders

1M+ insights

Marketing leaders from Notion, Chime, Poshmark & 3 more

by SuperMe

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you choose an ideal customer profile?
Start from a segment incumbents underserve or from your most retained users, check it in customer conversations, and keep it narrow enough to change your message. Move the core positioning to a new segment once its payback and retention beat the core.
How can you tell if your positioning is working?
Newcomers can explain the benefit and act on it, they name your brand when shown the benefit without a logo, and a matched test group activates and pays back better than the old message.
How do you plan a product launch?
Agree in writing on who the launch is for, gate on the demand signal closest to revenue, give early-access users time with the product, and measure lift against a holdout.
What has to be ready before a launch?
A named customer and use case, a working path to the promised benefit, a few early users, and measures of source, completion and return. Full campaigns and brand guidelines can follow.
Which channels bring in technical buyers?
Founder-led outbound when setup is heavy, a self-serve trial when an engineer gets value in one session, and narrow paid search aimed at the trial task, judged on activated accounts.

All go-to-market questions →

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you choose an ideal customer profile?

Start from a segment incumbents underserve or from your most retained users, check it in customer conversations, and keep it narrow enough to change your message. Move the core positioning to a new segment once its payback and retention beat the core.

When a SaaS partner program is worth building

Marketing Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you choose an ideal customer profile?

How can you tell if your positioning is working?

How do you plan a product launch?

What has to be ready before a launch?

Which channels bring in technical buyers?

Your ideas, super powered.

When a SaaS partner program is worth building

Marketing Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you choose an ideal customer profile?

How can you tell if your positioning is working?

How do you plan a product launch?

What has to be ready before a launch?

Which channels bring in technical buyers?

Your ideas, super powered.