LoginSign Up

Michelle Goad

I build and transform consumer brands | Chief Brand Officer | ex-CDO @ Athleta | Nike GM | Founder | TCG Operating Partner | Gen Alpha + Gen Z
154K insights
Visible to Michelle
Michelle won't be able to see or reply to your conversation in incognito mode
Ask about me
Learn from my insights
Jam on a problem
I build brands, communities, and intellectual property that create cultural relevance and commercial value.Over the last two decades, I’ve helped launch startups, scale billion-dollar businesses, and reinvent iconic cons...
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area
Michelle Goad

Dan Reese

@DanReese21

I was leading Heinz Ketchup when Dip N Squeeze came out. It was a massive upgrade from ketchup packets. Consumers LOVED it. Problem was we couldn’t get any of the big fast-food players on board. Dip N Squeeze was 3-5x (I forget the exact numbers) more expensive than packets, and they were free for customers. The key question was “does having Dip N Squeeze drive more volume?”, thus justifying the incremental cost. It was nearly impossible to prove. Every penny matters to these operators, so every sales meeting was the same. “We love it, but no.” Chick Fil A was the only yes. They didn’t need “proof”. They operated under the assumption simply giving their customers a better experience would pay off in the long run. Incremental cost be damned. Their conviction was impressive. They viewed every decision thru the lens of their customer. A much different approach from the other big players. I assume they treated countless other decisions the same way. This was ~15 years ago. CFA has been on quite the run since. (separate but related, I believe being a private co is a massive competitive advantage for CFA)

I was leading Heinz Ketchup when Dip N Squeeze came out.

It was a massive upgrade from ketchup packets. Consumers LOVED it.

Problem was we couldn’t get any of the big fast-food players on board.

Dip N Squeeze was 3-5x (I forget the exact numbers) more expensive than packets, and they were free for customers.

The key question was “does having Dip N Squeeze drive more volume?”, thus justifying the incremental cost.

It was nearly impossible to prove. Every penny matters to these operators, so every sales meeting was the same. “We love it, but no.”

Chick Fil A was the only yes.

They didn’t need “proof”. They operated under the assumption simply giving their customers a better experience would pay off in the long run. Incremental cost be damned.

Their conviction was impressive. 

They viewed every decision thru the lens of their customer. A much different approach from the other big players.

I assume they treated countless other decisions the same way.

This was ~15 years ago. CFA has been on quite the run since.

(separate but related, I believe being a private co is a massive competitive advantage for CFA)
View on 𝕏
Michelle Goad

Sean Frank

@Seanfrank

"Brand" is used so much that it is meaningless. Using one word, what best describes "brand" to you:

View on 𝕏
Michelle Goad
View on LinkedIn
Michelle Goad

Michael J. Miraflor

@michaelmiraflor

I hate how every new "cool" hotel concept in NYC involves rooms no larger than 150 sq ft. Might as well call them what they are - upscale hostels.

View on 𝕏
Michelle Goad
View on LinkedIn
Get the App
New to SuperMe?

Sign up free to work on your questions with people who've been there, like Michelle.Download SuperMe for the best experience