Just released playable posts! Play directly in the posts 👇

and most of them are founders or future founders. when i start hiring i only wanna hire the future founder types. think of working at my startup as the practice to leverage all that i can offer. the ideal promotion is to quit, and i invest in the round and make as many intros as i possibly can. will become a reality soon

Vertical personal agents and account ownership I don't buy that there will be one general-purpose personal agent. I think there will be specific agents for: •productivity / work •food and grocery •money •health Each of these will be owned by whoever controls the system of record and the right to act. Take money. The money agent should be your bank account and execute transactions on your behalf. It has the ledger, the license, the fraud models, and the liability when something goes wrong. A general agent that "logs into" your bank is a screen scraper with ambition. The bank that becomes an agent is the agent. The same pattern repeats: •Food and grocery: Whoever owns the cart, the inventory, and the last mile. The agent knows what's in your fridge because it put it there. •Health: Whoever holds your records, your labs, and a relationship with a licensed provider. Advice without the chart is a guess. Action without a license is a lawsuit. •Productivity / work: Whoever owns your calendar, inbox, and docs. Context is the moat, and it already lives somewhere. Agents win on three things: data, permission, and accountability. A horizontal agent can borrow the first, beg for the second, and has none of the third. Trust isn't general either. I'll let an agent book my dinner without asking. I won't let the same agent wire $50K or change my medication. Each domain has its own risk tolerance, its own regulation, and its own definition of "done." One agent can't hold all of those thresholds at once. The general-purpose agent doesn't disappear. It becomes the router. It's the front desk that knows which specialist to call. That's a real product, but it's thin. Routers commoditize, and the specialists capture the value. The question isn't "who builds the best assistant?" It's "who owns the account the assistant acts on?" The incumbents with licenses and ledgers have a bigger head start than they realize. The startups that win will either become the system of record in a vertical or make themselves impossible to route around. The future isn't one agent that does everything. It's a handful of agents that each own something.

What if the jagged frontier is mainly math + code (which you can push arbitrarily far with RLVR), and everything else starts to plateau because it is still bottlenecked by human generated data? Model performance in non-verifiable areas has kept improving steadily, albeit much slower than for math and code. But is that steady improvement a side effect of a higher G (itself driven by RLVR), or only a function of the amount of new human data getting injected into training (which is still continually happening on a massive scale)? A lot of things depend on the answer to this question

I've watched this video 6 times. This hits hard for any founders fund raising rn